From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-21875-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 7611 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2016 16:00:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 21875
Received: (qmail 4443 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2016 16:00:48 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.216.170):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 0.309229 secs); 12 Sep 2016 16:00:48 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,
	T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: sgniazdowski@gmail.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=zOpZYS90Gemt4jBM5/vYcjwRN0mayr6i0jWrXv7LTMI=;
        b=CGyfZ8BqRrdrdwYJdj2eVbW+TBmpWPx2fae59N+TYtfGETR2usLqBdgkdyCcU8qSd1
         kKaW3q9t2Z3NfCj6XdEPBUBnUcP+O3wTFoCXsLYzJBeE7yOrgy6ruOXTn0vP59nGwWac
         aXMnKixhoKAOFptiGmPqz7/iuPP+HINFpAaltgQsvggsSDsMAEgvUAxr904ioE13O+1m
         xEW4r8CHl9bwmhz9Oy5CBxhOf8ER8p11jO5JPGz2Rl/6VQhxA000Qgbaz10oSzg3YKk2
         pGc9I8lvM9f03KmrrW4jpb49NIET3Ial4yEBtfwi0QxVL4779M3SECMakpIMIqMWsjH0
         VR4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=zOpZYS90Gemt4jBM5/vYcjwRN0mayr6i0jWrXv7LTMI=;
        b=XfhiS9BjtL3MkNNlXSfaikTn2y4FUwqlTlyhTBbpkWf8QZVoL4Jtpu/qhnLH3kDFBo
         LYQrHX0toEBoswAV2QqynllpVEmlmvWS2S8AaL5Xs2hcJaXo0slWxEZTIzoyKdNGy7Qf
         /n7zlZXJG3paLNq2H3HgpS/CRaJ6iwzobe3lPBwnKru1+YKzssBpxeSrT/MZ85kjeiLP
         j8NuAQGBbmov5ojLHoRp4dHiZ9xKeSsf2ErONJ2IgpP8eQo5yCJDxC37OFaw31A/lvpF
         LLofXQPRkubuKPsJ+0jjGTz3SCg16JeSMzRZdnHlITdx7regh35nxnniV929tP8pj71S
         AG/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwN4QkW5zy/M9Apzlv4VY1ReXACNRy7a5qboKjJfSLmis/2ZFNerJrUyG8z8ULwhROa6fCX3EZtylAgAvQ==
X-Received: by 10.237.56.170 with SMTP id k39mr19922365qte.138.1473694180933;
 Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 17:29:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKc7PVBMgptkuPOmrcevDwsOrcWzeqO03G8xfr-aGoDade2EQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Do file descriptors survive to subshell?
To: Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hello,
I run subshell (zsh-5.2-dev-1) and there, an exported variable
containing file descriptor works with cat <&$FD. I was first thinking
there's a bug when read -u $FD -t returned true for it, added bunch of
zwarns() to source, and was surprised that (util.c):

ret = select(fd+1, (SELECT_ARG_2_T) &foofd, NULL, NULL, &expire_tv);


returns 1, i.e. one ready fd in set. It is then when I tried to just
cat from the FD, and it worked. Is it expected? How could the FD
survive, maybe because I do flock() (program util-linux/flock, using
call flock()) on it? But the "survive FD" feature should work only for
"exec zsh-5.2-dev-1", not "zsh-5.2-dev-1", shouldn't it ...

Best regards,
Sebastian Gniazdowski