From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3655 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2015 16:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 21084 Received: (qmail 7713 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2015 16:24:29 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=XanOTfWNOd4y13XBoECUE2/FGH73YpjNoHLllz4zKqk=; b=hOXD/rAi8v8yRsEYkV4v4zjI3FKLQmE3bsFBbG7LcCicLCAvQSfN+9tRU2Fqcv0Gc4 cy4Pjo2kjRwnbTsZ5n3xvPMzk6OhStSEoOMobTg6Aep/kVr/RNlqhEbN4iReBm1Toh30 f6CJ5k04fvHpUAzVeohe/MsiTh961EzKgFL+xUIzodppZBx0drnHrPUqB67qTMe6wR1N 4bMDQ3jhNx+iwrRn7G6rw6tMfdLOE2GKT2m9p3+z7oArcpiZ34SD8SVarpc07YAuFNd2 GFcfSW9/VewiGxgstATbsYkfC6bOzRL/7Z+pGvS16UqIHPsC3Oj39+YjaVyPngLraivy mBvA== X-Received: by 10.25.167.197 with SMTP id q188mr10282448lfe.129.1449937467635; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 08:24:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <566C4623.1020205@gmail.com> References: <566B1D81.2090106@gmail.com> <566C4623.1020205@gmail.com> From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:24:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zsh slow and hogs cpu when using */*/*.ext on large file tree To: KARBOWSKI Piotr Cc: zsh-users@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 12 December 2015 at 17:06, KARBOWSKI Piotr wrote: > Hello, > > On 12/11/2015 10:46 PM, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote: >> >> What version of Zsh? 5.2 has optimizations that could help. Could you >> compare speeds? > > > That was 5.1.1, update to 5.2 and it seems to be faster, but still many > times slower than bash. > > > # time zsh -c 'cd /usr/portage && ls */*/*.ebuild >/dev/null' > zsh -c 'cd /usr/portage && ls */*/*.ebuild >/dev/null' 2.36s user 0.13s > system 99% cpu 2.493 total So it's step from ~20s to 2.493? Very nice, not that I'm neglecting your opinion about how this compares to Bash Best Regards, Sebastian Gniazdowski