On 5 April 2012 17:51, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Apr 5, 11:30am, Vaclav Zeman wrote:
> }
> } > Anybody want to have a stab at creating a vastly more efficient version
> } > of Src/params.c:arrayuniq() ?
> } I wonder if the attached patch does what you want here. It is fairly
> } untested and incomplete as I have not been able to find out how to
> } make sure that search.h gets included.
>
> Zsh has its own hash table implementation which ought to be used rather
> than introducing any new external dependencies, but otherwise this is
> the kind of thing I was suggesting.
>
> Or perhaps someone else has an even more clever idea.  Anything better
> than O(N^2) would help.
I have reimplemented the change using ZSH's own hash table. Please see
the attached patch.

-- 
VZ