From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9197 invoked by alias); 7 May 2012 14:35:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 17060 Received: (qmail 20186 invoked from network); 7 May 2012 14:35:21 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at bunkus.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bunkus.org; s=mail201203; t=1336400803; bh=Le+d7mBPxBpnfYfY3/BWrlWlkjEhNr0cIhAZSop5pCk=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Content-Type; b=r7duEf/SxZtDtHHTkQr1WzPCTb4ZmBCstHT43wSDYeUoxZ8AXML03SLTYcmWJ7/l8 ab1WiDZR35QAiEw037Qj4AHrbBJMPtKErSjxDyuCEWSF2GG9fKD6U11NoNFuhDCO86 nnTKyT/Zgkno6zXW2z0Uytb7qTXafomYyy0IDXaA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20120507084141.GA8366@lohen.blott-online.com> <120507071434.ZM10459@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:26:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zargs: unexpected, non-xargs behaviour From: Moritz Bunkus To: zsh-users@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hey, On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Moritz Bunkus wrote: > Well, then zargs is not POSIX compliant... ...and also not equivalent to GNU xargs. Also: In GNU xargs "-L" and "-n" have the very, very important distinction that "-L" implies "-x" while "-n" does not (GNU xargs from findutils 4.4.2). Kind regards, mo