From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16228 invoked from network); 18 Apr 1998 11:07:19 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Apr 1998 11:07:19 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA09647; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 06:53:43 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 06:53:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 12:53:25 +0200 (MET DST) From: Jonas Bofjall X-Sender: m9418@atle To: tep@colltech.com cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Perl and ZSH In-Reply-To: <199804180044.TAA19945@psasolar.psa.pencom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"dtXju1.0.8M2.iO8Er"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1467 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Fri, 17 Apr 1998 tep@colltech.com wrote: > I've actually been tinkering with the idea of embedding a Perl > interpreter inside ZSH but I got stumped when it came time to zsh is good because it keeps the executables size within bounds even while having all these features. But Perl is *complex*... Wouldn't it be time to modularize zsh some? And I don't mean autoloading of shell script functions but of compiled code. // Jonas [2:201/262.37]