From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12263 invoked from network); 29 May 2000 16:23:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 May 2000 16:23:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 11321 invoked by alias); 29 May 2000 16:22:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 3106 Received: (qmail 11314 invoked from network); 29 May 2000 16:22:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 10:21:47 -0600 (MDT) From: James Kirkpatrick Subject: Re: Stable? In-reply-to: <1000529085834.ZM29012@candle.brasslantern.com> To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-warning: asuwlink.uwyo.edu: jimkirk owned process doing -bs OK, I'll play "straight man" in this exchange. If it's changing so fast, how can it be called stable :-) Perhaps one needs to distinguish between "stable" and "production-quality". If the changes are bug fixes then I'd not call it production-ready. If the changes are additional new features, or the bugs are extremely obscure, then I might. Jim On Mon, 29 May 2000, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On May 29, 10:51am, Nemeth Ervin wrote: > } Subject: Re: Stable? > } > } >>>>> jarausch writes: > } > } > Oh, it's super stable. We are using 3.1.6 since ages and > } > } I see. With all respects -- why is it marked beta? > > Because it's changing so fast. > > -- > Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises > http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com > > Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net >