From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12120 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2000 22:00:24 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 20 Jul 2000 22:00:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 21689 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2000 21:59:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 3310 Received: (qmail 21682 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2000 21:59:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:59:53 +0300 (EEST) From: Juhapekka Tolvanen To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Features of rc and es to zsh Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Well, it seems that according to this doc shells called es and rc has some features, that zsh does not have: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/shell-differences/ zsh rc es Low level command redefinition N N Y Has anonymous functions N Y Y Lexically scoped variables N N Y Exceptions N N Y But is that true? Or is that document outdated? If that document is right, what and when you zsh-developers are going to do to rectify situation? -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * U of Jyväskylä * juhtolv@st.jyu.fi http://www.cc.jyu.fi/~juhtolv/ * * "STRAIGHT BUT NOT NARROW !!" --------------------------------------------------------------- "if i was twice the man i could be, i'd still be half of what you need" Nine Inch Nails