From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18486 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2001 01:31:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Mar 2001 01:31:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 27470 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2001 01:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 3773 Received: (qmail 27457 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2001 01:31:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:33:07 -0700 (MST) From: Jeff Shipman X-X-Sender: To: Bart Schaefer cc: Subject: Re: vim bindings from nowhere In-Reply-To: <010329161855.ZM19861@candle.brasslantern.com> Message-ID: Organization: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Bart Schaefer wrote: > Could you explain what "getting vim keybindings" means? > > Do you mean that ZLE behaves entirely like vi, or do you mean that > somehow keys in the emacs mode are becoming bound to vim-like sequences? It means that zle behaves entirely like vi > Are any of those variables named EDITOR or VISUAL, by any chance? > > If EDITOR or VISUAL contains the substring "vi", then ZLE starts up with > the vi mode bindings, otherwise it starts up with emacs mode. Yes, I suppose that would be it, I do use 'vim' for my editor and visual, but I do so under both accounts and only one of my accounts have this problem. I do like vim, so that's what I use, but I do not like zsh's vi keybindings. Jeff "Shippy" Shipman E-Mail: shippy@nmt.edu Computer Science Major ICQ: 1786493 New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Homepage: http://www.nmt.edu/~shippy