From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-3779-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 27806 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2001 16:32:15 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Mar 2001 16:32:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 29143 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2001 16:32:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 3779
Received: (qmail 29113 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2001 16:32:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:33:49 -0700 (MST)
From: Jeff Shipman <shippy@nmt.edu>
X-X-Sender:  <shippy@neptune>
To: Matt Armstrong <matt.armstrong@openwave.com>
cc: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@candle.brasslantern.com>, <zsh-users@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: vim bindings from nowhere
In-Reply-To: <87k858vxg0.fsf@mortimer.phone.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0103300931430.24326-100000@neptune>
Organization: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

> The account without zle vi mode probably has a 'binkey -e' in its
> /etc/zshrc (or similar).

Nope, none of my accounts have 'bindkey -e' and neither
do any of my /etc/zsh* files.

> On that account, try running 'zsh -xl -c exit >& foo'.  Then you can
> open up 'foo' and see who is calling bindkey, if anyone.

I did this on all of my accounts and I do not see any
references to 'bindkey' in there.

I'm going to assume that for some reason zsh is
being wacky and so I'll just set 'bindkey -e' manually
for the account that's acting up.

Thanks,

Jeff "Shippy" Shipman     E-Mail: shippy@nmt.edu
Computer Science Major    ICQ: 1786493
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Homepage: http://www.nmt.edu/~shippy