From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28326 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2004 15:59:32 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 24 Oct 2004 15:59:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 76904 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2004 15:59:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 24 Oct 2004 15:59:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 14424 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2004 15:59:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8101 Received: (qmail 14405 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2004 15:59:15 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 24 Oct 2004 15:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 75866 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2004 15:59:15 -0000 Received: from moonbase.zanshin.com (64.84.47.139) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 24 Oct 2004 15:59:12 -0000 Received: from toltec.zanshin.com (toltec.zanshin.com [64.84.47.166]) by moonbase.zanshin.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9OFx94t003873; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:59:09 -0700 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Reply-To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk To: "s. keeling" cc: zsh-users Subject: Re: Porting an alias from bash to zsh fails. In-Reply-To: <20041024045152.GA26617@infidel.spots.ab.ca> Message-ID: References: <20041023215252.GA24164@infidel.spots.ab.ca> <20041023231442.GA24632@infidel.spots.ab.ca> <20041024045152.GA26617@infidel.spots.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: 0.0 On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, s. keeling wrote: > Perhaps I should start a new thread here, but should I assign any > significance to the fact that bash =~ 0.51 Mb and zsh =~ 0.4 Mb? You mean, the size of the binaries on disk? Have you looked at "ls -l ${^module_path}/*" ?