From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25528 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2005 01:33:01 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Jun 2005 01:33:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 78587 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2005 01:32:54 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 8 Jun 2005 01:32:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 6401 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2005 01:32:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 8981 Received: (qmail 6391 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2005 01:32:46 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 8 Jun 2005 01:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 77528 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2005 01:32:46 -0000 Received: from vanunu.ucsc.edu (128.114.141.22) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 8 Jun 2005 01:32:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vanunu.ucsc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC94154F0CD for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:32:52 -0700 (PDT) From: William Scott X-X-Sender: wgscott@vanunu.ucsc.edu To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Avoid LDAP hit during completion In-Reply-To: <99F1A6E4-08F6-4815-BBF4-5047F5E764DA@kalama.no-ip.org> Message-ID: References: <200506070926.j579QW1R022316@news01.csr.com> <2BEEA527-E202-4FC2-BF10-EEF108F473DB@mac.com> <1e7d10fea1822db04c209365d48db60f@mac.com> <99F1A6E4-08F6-4815-BBF4-5047F5E764DA@kalama.no-ip.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 I think this might be happening if you have configured OSX to consult /etc/passwd by default and have those remote directories listed in there. If they were in NetInfo or somewhere else non-canonical that zsh would not see, then the problem would not arise on a network. Maybe it would be easiest to reset the $userdirs array to something tractable. On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, lists wrote: > There's userdirs as per Bart's prediction (although I'm not sure what > part it plays here). Weird that this hasn't bitten me before. > However, given the fact that your problem doesn't always happen upon > the first completion, I too wonder if DirectorySerivce, the network, > or solar flares are also contributing. > > -Ryan > > On Jun 7, 2005, at 6:19 PM, Chris wong wrote: > > > ********************************************************************** > > **** > > * +_all_labels:39> compadd -F _comp_ignore -J -default- -qS/ -k > > userdirs * > > ********************************************************************** > > **** >