From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4256 invoked from network); 1 Jul 1997 12:09:58 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Jul 1997 12:09:58 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA02769; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 07:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 07:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 15:59:14 +0400 (MSD) From: Andrej Borsenkow X-Sender: bor@itsrm1 Reply-To: borsenkow.msk@sni.de To: Andy Eskilsson cc: john.cooper@digitivity.com, zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: zsh for NT? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"uHiF01.0.8g.-0Fkp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/927 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On 1 Jul 1997, Andy Eskilsson wrote: > / "John Cooper" wrote: > | Has anyone yet ported zsh to NT? (bash is becoming tiresome!) > > Yep, a guy at Micro$oft, named Amol Deshpande, a binary can be found > at ftp://ftp.blarg.net/users/amol/zsh. Seems to work quite good > really. Don't remember the version but I don't think it is the latest. > It reports itself as 3.0.2-nt-beta-0.12. I am not shure, if it usable without GNU environment - it doesn't understand either 'dir' or 'ls' ;-) Also, I am having problems with ZLE (well, I just tried for ten minutes). This site doesn't seem to have any docs. Very interesting would be port of 3.1 (including modules support). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrej Borsenkow Fax: +7 (095) 252 01 05 SNI ITS Moscow Tel: +7 (095) 252 13 88 NERV: borsenkow.msk E-Mail: borsenkow.msk@sni.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------