From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21695 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2011 16:42:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 15820 Received: (qmail 17979 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2011 16:42:03 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: zsh-users@zsh.org From: zzapper Subject: Re: Regular expressions in zsh Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Organization: SuccessTheory Message-ID: References: <20110219033809.GA72507@quark.hightek.org> <20110219054807.GA57597@redoubt.spodhuis.org> X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dsl78-143-228-30.in-addr.fast.co.uk User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.24 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110223-0, 23/02/2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Phil Pennock wrote in news:20110219054807.GA57597@redoubt.spodhuis.org: > > zsh has had -pcre-match for a very long time; it's only the =~ operator > which is newish; note that if you're a Perl fan, then you might: > > setopt REMATCH_PCRE > > to use PCRE regexps instead of the system regexp library's extended > regexp syntax. > > You're welcome. :) [though I can't claim credit for the original > -pcre-match]. > Hi Have you any illustrative examples of using REMATCH_PCRE? -- zzapper http://zzapper.co.uk/ Technical Tips