From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29153 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 09:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 17016 Received: (qmail 26455 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2012 09:09:23 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at benizi.com designates 64.130.10.15 as permitted sender) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:01:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Benjamin R. Haskell" To: Bart Schaefer cc: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: [OT] Emacs and zsh syntax In-Reply-To: <120416082155.ZM3144@torch.brasslantern.com> Message-ID: References: <20120416130811.GA3827@xvii.vinc17.org> <120416082155.ZM3144@torch.brasslantern.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Apr 16, 3:08pm, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > } > } I had reported the following bug in 2005: > } http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335712 > > Cynical jaundiced viewpoint: Zsh is not a GNU project, and therefore > it isn't their priority to fix anything related to it. Optimistic viewpoint: The bug should have been reported upstream, since it's not a distribution-specific problem. (From the report, sounds like it may have made its way upstream.) -- Best, Ben