From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18472 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2018 17:08:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 23078 Received: (qmail 20218 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Jan 2018 17:08:51 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mta01.eastlink.ca by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(24.224.136.30):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 5.464827 secs); 08 Jan 2018 17:08:51 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: rayandrews@eastlink.ca X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=OKgJIxSB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=RnRVsdTsRxS/hkU0yKjOWA==:117 a=RnRVsdTsRxS/hkU0yKjOWA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=n5AL75jmG6VLGIH7CFEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-EL-IP-NOAUTH: 24.207.101.9 Subject: Re: command on switching terminals? To: zsh-users@zsh.org References: <5dbdfef3-65c0-b780-76a8-86ed79c0d8e4@eastlink.ca> <85f067e1-5b38-cace-fced-15370dec6793@eastlink.ca> <20180108160801.62d960e3@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> From: Ray Andrews Message-id: Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 08:38:40 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 In-reply-to: <20180108160801.62d960e3@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Content-language: en-CA On 08/01/18 08:08 AM, Peter Stephenson wrote: > > You need to "zmodload zsh/complist", but actually if you don't have that > loaded those lines aren't doing anything anyway, so no big deal, just > ignore. > > pws > > At the risk of biting off more than I can chew, is there some place I can read up on all that stuff?  I'm taking Mikael's code on faith, these lines in particular seem black-magical: printf '\e[?1004h' bindkey '^[[I' focus-in $WIDGET = focus-in ... it seems sorta like 'keystrokes' are really commands but they aren't really keystrokes.  This is a whole new vista, I think.