From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from zero.zsh.org (zero.zsh.org [IPv6:2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454C6221BC for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 21:17:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Subject:To:From:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=5zh5vAlceuZfsnJJUkxQc8oCjb3sVVu8rtnpZrQXaZM=; b=KfxWZQgI5Uu7yA9bSRflJB2shM lNZf+pF/31HnrOxv4T3iD13b+5x0VBCJ/Yc5gaXxglwZbZAuHpN6IoWIBSeINk5K1Mo4+UvzcQBfo 8URWLHCrxeUKA2qocUSScrHYdVNf3heio26eqoq6ySYuaJZUFnFSA78yH7FxyxAFP9Iz5iQyhM6N4 9QMVNpaCpg7W8MQvK9glNCD0vCHqKNtYl8QRXTR8vJaUHg6txZ8lrRQa7pySOhRrdw9s44Tcwe7KD QJr8UDwqX0kvLsTUP1Q0ou1RQSHb4BT9V4f33JnbiYtsOayEVz5+V7wKhdBC8vHvN4ZQYT0ZMucJS xSd2R6Sw==; Received: by zero.zsh.org with local id 1rTSe3-000NNn-HR; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 20:17:47 +0000 Received: by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1rTSdX-000MfU-2G; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 20:17:17 +0000 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657A227C0066 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:17:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap48 ([10.202.2.98]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:17:13 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdeljedgudeffecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgrfihrvghntggvucggvghljoiiqhhuvgiiuceolhgr rhhrhihvseiishhhrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeileevheefgffhffeihe dtieegvdfgkeffteejgfetledtiedviedvteeukeegkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlrghrrhihvhdomhgvshhmthhprghuth hhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqudduhedukeejjedtgedqudduledvjeefkeehqdhlrghr rhihvheppeiishhhrdhorhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iaa214773:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2F67931A0065; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:17:13 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-119-ga8b98d1bd8-fm-20240108.001-ga8b98d1b MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <76eab1d7-be5b-4786-9c23-c9d63a3ba27b@eastlink.ca> References: <73E4333B-C282-4A58-837C-A50F73E13289@dondley.com> <680FA5D3-E8FD-49F2-9AE3-C169A6D9DA9E@dondley.com> <4a1df20e-70c4-41ed-b370-4fbbae0619b9@app.fastmail.com> <3DC872AC-5B19-468D-85D5-5D3A501EF7E9@dondley.com> <2CF29A22-6721-4275-8E92-7FF61CE4CDCB@dondley.com> <316F625D-EC13-43C5-808F-B78DD09E906C@dondley.com> <80CBCA13-4B81-4522-8A98-4CE14B524CDA@dondley.com> <76eab1d7-be5b-4786-9c23-c9d63a3ba27b@eastlink.ca> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:16:52 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: Can't tell the difference in operation between PATH_SCRIPT and NO_PATH_SCRIPT Content-Type: text/plain X-Seq: 29592 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-users@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-users-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-users-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, at 3:06 PM, Ray Andrews wrote: > Yup, so there's the dilemma. But even then, as Steve's little example > above shows, within the culture of a manual (not a help resource) > things could be better. If it were up to me I'd paste Steve's little > edit above into the manual -- subject to a close look by the experts of > course. The devs have admitted a few changes, but much more could be > done IMHO. Things don't have to be terse and obscure. I'm going to go ahead and nip this in the bud. If you have specific suggestions, as Steve does, that feedback is welcome. Otherwise, I'm going to ask that you stop flooding the mailing list with your periodic, unhelpful "the manual is useless!" diatribes. In practice, they are wholly unpersuasive and accomplish nothing except irritating those who have contributed to the manual or might be inclined to do so in the future. -- vq