From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 25049 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2023 19:22:34 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Apr 2023 19:22:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=4grlo7II0JBbHi/plqIyYR7CVH9/fAd4/+JkUodBHgM=; b=feSF0Ralg//85mMH/rYS4IAuuD Wo00AuLULWW62uib1V+NU2/dEtDfNuuohNt3FKew1SXJygBbnb9DFIV34HHjKVorX6+3tvdnjm1t9 Kfvn0NPfqZVnzbVpTQxDkTW3cJ5EKaEqCaAZC3fPddZS+od9KMnjlVYeVXs8c7WKzIOe8cjW7kwz7 JQU2JORUvAYlUvVKO+w4zOxkeWRV5s8qfiwKm19oKDYqVmeFDFCrmifbL5mk6879rE4vqNjJcfcfs clkZp6qzAd+vZyks29VYaNdTgM0eCo3CSLP13czN7Tl+29L4yui/KIVHVReOjA1GWNgMWZYMV/MNL NBgIw6kg==; Received: by zero.zsh.org with local id 1pigo5-0003gR-E3; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:22:33 +0000 Received: by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1pigmi-0002yM-NK; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:21:08 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F29A27C0054; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 15:21:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap48 ([10.202.2.98]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Apr 2023 15:21:06 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeifedgudefiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgr fihrvghntggvucggvghljoiiqhhuvgiiuceolhgrrhhrhihvseiishhhrdhorhhgqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefggffhkeevjeeghfegvedvgfelkeefteelgefhjeelieevtedt keeikedvteeuhfenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghdprghushhtihhnghhrohhuph gsuhhgshdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehlrghrrhihvhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqud duhedukeejjedtgedqudduledvjeefkeehqdhlrghrrhihvheppeiishhhrdhorhhgsehf rghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iaa214773:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 49B8031A0064; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 15:21:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-238-g746678b8b6-fm-20230329.001-g746678b8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 15:20:18 -0400 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= To: "Felipe Contreras" Cc: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is POSIX compliant) Content-Type: text/plain X-Seq: 29007 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-users@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-users-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-users-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Fri, Mar 31, 2023, at 4:16 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > I think everyone can agree POSIX is not clear about this. I do agree. It looks like a situation where everyone involved was already familiar with the intended behavior (as per Chet Ramey [1]) and baked their assumptions into the drafted text, leaving it less explicit than it should have been. For the curious, a bug report has been opened on the Austin Group defect tracker [2]. [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2023-03/msg00175.html [2]: https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1649 -- vq