From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25948 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2017 13:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 23003 Received: (qmail 21044 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Dec 2017 13:54:20 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from aok120.rev.netart.pl by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(85.128.245.120):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 9.591119 secs); 12 Dec 2017 13:54:20 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: psprint@zdharma.org X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV (14) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:41:26 +0100 From: Sebastian Gniazdowski To: Zsh Users Message-ID: Subject: Is outer quoting not needed (docs say "redundant")? X-Mailer: Airmail (442) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, manual says: =22in =22=24=7B(=40f)=22=24(foo)=22=7D=22, there are two sets =C2=A0of qu= otes, =C2=A0one =C2=A0surrounding =C2=A0the whole expression, the other (= redundant) surrounding the =24(foo) as before.=22 One user reported that single, outer quoting always worked for him. Word = =22redundant=22 quite confirms this, but can we be sure=3F Nevertheless, = I'll add a note to my handbook, will not replace example, because it well= showns that quotings don't e.g. cancel each other (on the other hand, in= ner quoting doesn't have a real role, hm). -- =20 Sebastian Gniazdowski psprint /at/ zdharma.org