From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-19192-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10520 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 15:05:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 19192
Received: (qmail 19095 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2014 15:05:44 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2
	autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
From: Yuri D'Elia <wavexx@thregr.org>
Subject: Re: Empty directories
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:47:17 +0200
Message-ID: <m0h45m$lms$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <m0gm6c$iq2$1@ger.gmane.org> <m0gmae$iq2$2@ger.gmane.org> <20141001120022.72b2bf53@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <m0gt5k$i0h$1@ger.gmane.org> <20141001142506.52d75405@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.106.183.2
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.0
In-Reply-To: <20141001142506.52d75405@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>

On 10/01/2014 03:25 PM, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> aren't which would need to be grouped differently.  There are already
> way too many cases no one really understands in _path_files, so this

This made me smile ;)

I tried to look into _path_files, and there's actually a special rule to
handle empty directories, though I got lost in the expansion loop.