From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-2438-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 8475 invoked from network); 14 Jul 1999 19:27:39 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Jul 1999 19:27:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 27411 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 1999 19:27:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 2438
Received: (qmail 27404 invoked from network); 14 Jul 1999 19:27:12 -0000
To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk
Subject: Re: vi-mode on linux?
References: <19990714093143.C2459@qualityic.com> <378CD3A9.BDBA6E44@pdi.com> <19990714133557.F2459@qualityic.com>
From: Bruce Stephens <bruce@cenderis.demon.co.uk>
Date: 14 Jul 1999 20:27:28 +0100
In-Reply-To: Rand Bamberg's message of "Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:35:57 -0500"
Message-ID: <m3n1wzghgf.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) XEmacs/21.1 (Arches)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Rand Bamberg <rand@qualityic.com> writes:

> Putting "bindkey -v" in my .zshrc does correctly put me into
> vi-mode.  A harmless-enough workaround -- although it still seems
> like there's an obscure zsh/linux bug in there.

See what RedHat's rpm installs.  It could be that there's something in
the /etc/zlogin or /etc/zshrc files.