From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28453 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2002 22:14:20 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Feb 2002 22:14:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 2187 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2002 22:13:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 4662 Received: (qmail 2176 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2002 22:13:57 -0000 Sender: flognat@localhost.localdomain To: Gary Oberbrunner Cc: Zefram , Gabor , zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: usage of zsh for profit? References: <20020206104852.A74470@vmunix.com> <20020206160524.GB26831@fysh.org> <3C6176A8.1050600@genarts.com> From: Andrew Markebo Date: 06 Feb 2002 23:13:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3C6176A8.1050600@genarts.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii And the endless discussion begins.. | But it's actually a cygwin program, at least on Windows, right? Depends on how they port it.. probably | Aren't all cygwin programs GPLed because of cygwin1.dll? Now as to Well you actually can compile a program with cygwin gcc and skip cygwin1.dll, but probably not in this case.. | whether including a GPL program in your commercial product is OK I Well it is ok, as long as you provide the source to the stuff using cygwin1.dll, zsh in this case, and the cygwin1.dll source too of course.. If I am not completely off in my readings.. Earlier you could buy/fix a license from redhat to use cygwin1.dll commercially, without needing to send sources.. No idea how it is today. /Andy -- The eye of the beholder rests on the beauty!