From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7420 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2015 21:04:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 20147 Received: (qmail 3781 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2015 21:03:53 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: zsh-users@zsh.org From: Yuri D'Elia Subject: Re: show-ambiguity style Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 23:03:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <150411130249.ZM27498@torch.brasslantern.com> <552A67C4.1080903@thregr.org> <150412115830.ZM21859@torch.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.106.183.18 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 In-Reply-To: <150412115830.ZM21859@torch.brasslantern.com> On 04/12/2015 08:58 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > I don't know that it makes any difference to efficiency, but to have > the ambiguity disply overlaid on top of the other coloring would require > changes to the complist internals. My guess would be that it would probably end up being simpler and more robust compared to the current approach. Although I won't have time to look at this anytime soon. Any takers? > The main thing this is telling me is that we need more examples of how > to set list-colors. I'll put up some examples later next week.