From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-3485-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 20208 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2000 12:47:22 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Oct 2000 12:47:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 27674 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2000 12:46:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 3485
Received: (qmail 27666 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2000 12:46:38 -0000
To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk
Date: 27 Oct 2000 14:47:48 +0200
From: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Message-ID: <mv4d7gm8n7v.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr>
Organization: EPITA / LRDE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <000001c0400a$54f99fb0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>, <000101c0400b$f2563dd0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
Subject: Re: Trap and exit
Sender: news <news@epita.fr>


| OTOH both sh and ksh here behave the same as Zsh. Unless there are
| compatibility reasons, I still prefer sh/bash.

What implementation are you referring to?  What do you call `ksh' and
`sh' here?