Re: 'ignore-line yes' style semantics?

["Ole Jørgen Brønner" <olejorgenb@yahoo.no>]

On Thu, 12 May 2011 19:45:32 +0200, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2011/5/9 Ole Jørgen Brønner <olejorgenb@yahoo.no>:
>>>>> ignore-line
>>>>>
>>>>>  Finally, if the style is set to other, no word apart from
>>>>>  the current one will be considered as a possible completion.
>>>
>>> Did you paste this manpage extract as a way of saying "never mind, I
>>> found the answer"? But then why did you press send? Color me confused.
>>>
>>
>> Hehe :), no just so other people had a quick reference for the current
>> behavior. I want to change it or add an extra option
>
> Okay, maybe the text you pasted is obvious to me, but not to you, or I
> am completely misunderstanding what you want to do. Does setting the
> style to "other" not do exactly what you want?
>

Hm.. that seems indeed to be the case :) I can no longer remember what I thought the 'other' value did. Maybe something like that _only_ the current word (of like, all possible words) would be considered, although that doesn't make sense at all. I can swear I tested it though, but apparently not.

Thanks, and sorry for the last double post