From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5032 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 10:29:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Mar 1999 10:29:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 12491 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 1999 10:28:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 2259 Received: (qmail 12483 invoked from network); 30 Mar 1999 10:27:58 -0000 Sender: gjb@cs.washington.edu To: "Bart Schaefer" Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Updating the Xterm title with every execution? References: <81F7033862B6D211A6160000D11C16370838C7@trc-tpaexch01.trcinc.com> <19990325160956.A26503@lyric.cig.mot.com> <990329202514.ZM16609@candle.brasslantern.com> From: Greg Badros Date: 30 Mar 1999 02:27:53 -0800 In-Reply-To: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Mon, 29 Mar 1999 20:25:14 -0800" Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" "Bart Schaefer" writes: > } Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think 'preexec' exists in > } Zsh 3.0.5 > > It's in 3.0.5-ext-2, available from ftp.brasslantern.com:/pub/zsh/, which > will be the basis of 3.0.6 appearing (I hope, if I get the archive scripts > learned soon) sometime this month. That's great-- any chance of getting my colorized completion patch in there? It's plenty clean, has it's own option, and is pretty small -- it could be a compile-time switch if you're *really* concerned about memory footprint (zsh 3.0.x still does not have any dynamic loading capabilities, does it?). Since 3.0.6 is the end of the road for 3.0, the maintenance headache of another compile-time flag is not an issue. The patch is the first one listed at: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/gjb/patches/ I'll get it to apply cleanly without the postprompt stuff (assumming preexec will let me do what I want) to .0.5-ext-2 if you don't want to do that work. Thanks, Greg