From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16448 invoked from network); 7 Dec 1998 16:47:48 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Dec 1998 16:47:48 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA13793; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 11:46:40 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 11:46:35 -0500 (EST) Sender: B.Stephens@isode.com To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: How to NOT allow LC_COLLATE to corrupt globbing ??? References: <19981207144447.A13964@math.fu-berlin.de> <981207081603.ZM989@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Bruce Stephens Date: 07 Dec 1998 16:44:54 +0000 In-Reply-To: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Mon, 7 Dec 1998 08:16:03 -0800" Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.27/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Resent-Message-ID: <"Lx7NS.0.xM3.hP0Rs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1964 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu "Bart Schaefer" writes: > Hey, Tim, any chance you can try ksh in some other language > environment to see if it collates character ranges? I've just tried ksh93, and it seems to ignore LC_COLLATE in this case, whereas zsh uses LC_COLLATE. I think there's a strong case for changing zsh's behaviour here. Although I can see why one might want to treat accented letters and similar things in a locale specific way, ignoring case strikes me as far worse than doing the wrong thing with accented letters.