From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22701 invoked from network); 17 Aug 1998 15:25:06 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 Aug 1998 15:25:06 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA21882; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 11:09:39 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 11:09:31 -0400 (EDT) Sender: B.Stephens@isode.com To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Cc: dfavor@austin.ibm.com (David R. Favor) Subject: Re: Parameter Expansion questions References: <199808171445.PAA24008@diamond.tao.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Bruce Stephens Date: 17 Aug 1998 16:10:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Zefram"'s message of "Mon, 17 Aug 1998 15:45:33 +0100 (BST)" Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.27/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Resent-Message-ID: <"iT4wC1.0.IL5.fU4sr"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1722 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu "Zefram" writes: > OTOH, I suspect that you *really* want to be using an array > parameter. $path is an array version of $PATH, so you don't even > need to do the splitting manually in that case. Yes, when I first read it, I came up with splitpath="$path" But that's surely not a particularly useful thing to do. Well, I can't think of a use, anyway. Maybe I'm just not being creative today.