From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7166 invoked from network); 29 Jun 1999 09:20:17 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Jun 1999 09:20:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5138 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 1999 09:20:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6906 Received: (qmail 5128 invoked from network); 29 Jun 1999 09:20:07 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Peter Stephenson" , "Zsh hackers list" , "Zsh WWW maintainers" Subject: RE: public CVS archive Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:19:59 +0400 Message-ID: <000001bec210$8f5cee10$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <199906281751.TAA17561@hydra.ifh.de> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 > > After consideration, it seems too much work to try to fit previous versions > into it (there is no existing `official' CVS archive, just partial personal > ones), particularly with all the shifting of files in the latest version. > so I was thinking of starting this with the first test release of 3.1.6. I believe, 3.0.6 should be there as well. I don't know CVS good enough to decide, if it is worth making it a branch or just separate package. Making this a branch is probably too much overhead. /andrej