From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-7782-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 14368 invoked from network); 12 Sep 1999 11:27:19 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 12 Sep 1999 11:27:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 13184 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 1999 11:27:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 7782
Received: (qmail 13177 invoked from network); 12 Sep 1999 11:27:06 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "Tanaka Akira" <akr@jaist.ac.jp>, <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: RE: PATCH: _hosts, _hostports, _telnet and _socket
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:26:59 +0400
Message-ID: <000001befd11$ba0b0bb0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <rsq671hathg.fsf@crane.jaist.ac.jp>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

>
> I made `_telnet' and `_socket'. They may complete port number and
> names depend on a host argument.
>

Again, the same old question - *what* telnet? Ours does not understand any of
the options you list (more, than -8, host, port).

If Linux telnet is so smart - should this be put in Linux then?


/andrej