* Is complist really optional?
@ 2000-07-04 7:32 Andrej Borsenkow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrej Borsenkow @ 2000-07-04 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ZSH workers mailing list
I wonder, should not we load complist by default? It started as
experimental once, but now almost all bells and whistles of new
completion interface is based on it. Or simply merge complist with the
rest of completion code.
-andrej
Have a nice DOS!
B >>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Is complist really optional?
@ 2000-07-04 12:52 Sven Wischnowsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sven Wischnowsky @ 2000-07-04 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
> I wonder, should not we load complist by default? It started as
> experimental once, but now almost all bells and whistles of new
> completion interface is based on it.
I don't care much, but saying that `almost all...' are based on
complist is a bit much, don't you think?
> Or simply merge complist with the
> rest of completion code.
Do you mean to put it into the complete module? I /think/ there would
be people against it...
And currently it *is* quite cleanly separated. One can do without
complist, one can use it with new and with old completion...
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-07-04 12:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-07-04 7:32 Is complist really optional? Andrej Borsenkow
2000-07-04 12:52 Sven Wischnowsky
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).