From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-12155-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 8845 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2000 07:32:51 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Jul 2000 07:32:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 2275 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2000 07:32:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 12155
Received: (qmail 2200 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2000 07:32:17 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "ZSH workers mailing list" <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: Is complist really optional?
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:32:10 +0400
Message-ID: <000001bfe589$f701bdf0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700

I wonder, should not we load complist by default? It started as
experimental once, but now almost all bells and whistles of new
completion interface is based on it. Or simply merge complist with the
rest of completion code.

-andrej

Have a nice DOS!
B >>