From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-16142-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 22077 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 04:56:54 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 04:56:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 17440 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2001 04:56:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 16142
Received: (qmail 17427 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 04:56:34 -0000
From: Borsenkow Andrej <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "'S. Cowles'" <scowles@earthlink.net>,
   "'(Zsh hackers list)'"
	 <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: RE: Re[2]: 4.0.3
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 08:56:24 +0400
Message-ID: <000001c15d11$65c28a80$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3311
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <7673163203.20011024163849@earthlink.net>
Importance: Normal

> 
> ./C02cond.ztst: starting.
> Warning: Not testing [[ -b blockdevice ]] (no devices found)
> Test ./C02cond.ztst failed: bad status 1, expected 0 from:
>   [[ -g modish && ! -g zerolength ]]
> Was testing: -g cond
> ./C02cond.ztst: test failed.
> ./D03procsubst.ztst: starting.
> Test ./D03procsubst.ztst failed: bad status 1, expected 0 from:
>   paste <(cut -f1 FILE1) <(cut -f3 FILE2)
> Error output:
> ZTST_execchunk:2: doesn't look like your system supports FIFOs.
> Was testing: <(...) substitution
> ./D03procsubst.ztst: test failed.
> 

These are 15099 and unposted from Bart referring to 14826 (ChangeLog
from 2001-06-09). Should it go into 4.0? I was unsure about 15099 but
obviously nothing better has emerged since then.

-andrej