RE: PATCH: all completions

["Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>]

>
> Here's an improved patch. It gets the string displayed for the
> all-matches special match right (as described in 12936) and it has
> another style, `avoid-completer' (any suggestions for a better
> name?). That gives a list of completer-names for which no all-matches
> string should be added. It has what I think is a sensible default
> value.
>

The word ``matches'' in manual may be a bit misleading but I fail to suggest
better. We actually mean ``completion listing'' that completion code
internally builds. In case of _correct/_approximate or _expand it is actually
superset of possible matches (original word on line or all expansions).

Actually, it just occured to me, that exactly in case of _correct or
_approximate this distinction may be significant. User _may_ want to add all
*matches* but without original string. But this probably needs more user
feedback.

-andrej