From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13268-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 10580 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2000 08:29:29 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (HELO sunsite.auc.dk) (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Dec 2000 08:29:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 11147 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2000 08:29:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13268
Received: (qmail 11140 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2000 08:29:22 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: RE: Some problem with completion matching
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:29:19 +0300
Message-ID: <000201c065a7$f43212c0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <200012140718.IAA26085@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400


Sorry, I went blind for some reason.

>
> What's irritating you is probably that you seem to get different
> behaviours depending on the directory contents.

Yes. I am not sure, if there is sensible way to avoid it, but may be I get
some idea.

-andrej