From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15205 invoked from network); 3 Jul 1999 09:55:27 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Jul 1999 09:55:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 28682 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 1999 09:55:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6954 Received: (qmail 28675 invoked from network); 3 Jul 1999 09:55:12 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Oliver Kiddle" , Subject: RE: Problem with cursor position after wrapped completion lists Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 13:55:05 +0400 Message-ID: <000301bec53a$2061adc0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <377CDC4B.213CF7AB@thoth.u-net.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal > > I tried it again and it seemed to work fine in the new xterms and > aixterms which I created but after looking back in the aixterm where I'd > had the problems, I realised what the cause was. There was one > line in the list which was exactly 80 ($COLUMNS) characters wide. > Back in the past there was exactly this problem with Zle - if displayed line was exactly screen-width long, output was wrong. It was fixed by Geoff in a patch 4855 (I just looked up in archive). Sven, could you check if something from this patch is aplicable in this case? > > Peter Stephenson wrote: > > By the way, it's high time I pointed out that sending me a copy of a > > message going to any of the zsh lists is futile as they get sorted into the > > same folder and I just have to delete one. > Well, I am sorry for this as well ... but you see, to send _reply_ to zsh-workers that is in To: header I have to hit "reply-to-all" - there is no other possibility And exactly for this I'm using procmail with formail filter that eliminates duplicates (as long, as message-id is preserved) - so I get exactly one copy of all duplicates. /andrej