From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2269 invoked from network); 14 Aug 1999 10:45:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Aug 1999 10:45:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 885 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 1999 10:45:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7435 Received: (qmail 878 invoked from network); 14 Aug 1999 10:45:20 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer thoth.mch.sni.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "SAKAI Kiyotaka" , Subject: RE: [zsh-3.1.6] patch for zsh.texi Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 14:45:17 +0400 Message-ID: <000301bee642$18e31d80$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <19990811164248J.ksakai@kso.netwk.ntt-at.co.jp> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 > > I think zsh is not a utility but a shell (like bash), so dircategory > should be changed as follows. > I copied that from bash.info of bash-2.03, and there it was put in Utilities. May be, in some Linux distribution it is put in Shell. Not that I personally much care. The only problem is, that if we change it now, we will have remnant in Utilities section. Is it worth changing at all? /andrej