From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9954 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2000 07:33:06 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Jan 2000 07:33:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 7162 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2000 07:32:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9230 Received: (qmail 7154 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2000 07:32:58 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "ZSH workers mailing list" Subject: mapfile module - avoiding $(...) in completion functions Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:32:54 +0300 Message-ID: <000401bf5818$3e881bb0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200001051437.PAA10986@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 > > Since in the completion system we generally want to avoid the extra > processes needed for $(...), we would use caching for the printer > names there (and the function for the lp commands I just sent to > zsh-workers does that). And we would also make this nicer by > supporting the other mechanisms used throughout the completion system. > May be it was discussed already, but is not mapfile module alternative to $(...)? We mostly need it to parse files content, as in $(