From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9866 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2000 21:43:16 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Apr 2000 21:43:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 14645 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2000 21:43:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10676 Received: (qmail 14625 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2000 21:43:03 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <000411144233.ZM8932@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:42:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: 3.1.6-dev-22" (Apr 11, 9:18pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail Lite (5.0.0 30July97) To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Apr 11, 9:18pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: > Subject: Re: 3.1.6-dev-22 > "Bart Schaefer" wrote: > > I've sent a number of messages asking about potential changes, to which > > there have been no replies or at least no decision (e.g., 10346, > > If you don't see a problem with changing the way zshpaths.h is made (and I > presume you tried it out) then I certainly don't. Zefram? I believe it's your test I'm proposing to delete ... or maybe it's Zoltan's ... > > users/3013, > > Doesn't look that controversial to me. That's good, because I already committed it (after fixing some things). > Well, I came home today and there were 82 messages in my mailbox, so a > list wouldn't hurt. I'll try to generate one.