From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14697 invoked from network); 8 Jun 1999 09:01:05 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Jun 1999 09:01:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 15649 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 1999 09:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6517 Received: (qmail 15642 invoked from network); 8 Jun 1999 09:00:42 -0000 From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Peter Stephenson" , "Zsh hackers list" Subject: LFS and explicit LIBS RE: pws-21 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 13:00:02 +0400 Message-ID: <000501beb18d$4b51cdf0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <9906080801.AA15323@ibmth.df.unipi.it> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Now, that I finally got a debugger for my system (DBX), I decided to compile Zsh with debugging. To fully utilize DBX it is very advisable to link -lg into executable. Unfortunately, doing so disables LFS :-( It may be my private problem ... but I would *really* appreciate the way to force LFS even if some of CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS/LIBS are set. The joke is, I do not need LIBS to compile LFS program (getconf LFS_LIBS is empty). May be, for items, that are empty (LFS_CFLAGS, LFS_LDFLAGS etc) we should not disable LFS? /andrej