From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10190 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2000 10:57:15 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Jun 2000 10:57:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 4325 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2000 10:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 11978 Received: (qmail 4318 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2000 10:57:07 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: undo does not work in menu-selection Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 14:56:58 +0400 Message-ID: <000501bfd9dd$172f5140$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200006191024.MAA23615@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 > > Err? What should it undo? And keep in mind that undo has this > possibility to go up and resume completing in menu-selection. > > Hm, or make it leave selection when at the `top-level'? > This looks natural. And it is really confusing, when undo just does nothing at all. > But you have noticed how ^G behaves in menu-selection, yes? > Ehem ... sorry, yes. Still, it is better when a widget (undo in this case) has consistent behaviour. In this case, action is to start menu-selection - so "undone" action is to leave menu-selection? -andrej