* Automatic long options completion for --?
@ 2000-08-01 10:00 Andrej Borsenkow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrej Borsenkow @ 2000-08-01 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ZSH workers mailing list
Struggling with Cygwin I found myself wishing to get at least trivial
completion for arbitrary command with long options.
Is it possible to complete after -- for *any* command (of course, assuming
that no specific completion is defined)?
Of course, if this could extract help text as well ... :-)
-andrej
Have a nice DOS!
B >>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Automatic long options completion for --?
2000-08-01 11:02 Sven Wischnowsky
@ 2000-08-01 17:41 ` Bart Schaefer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bart Schaefer @ 2000-08-01 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
On Aug 1, 1:02pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: Re: Automatic long options completion for --?
}
} Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
}
} > Is it possible to complete after -- for *any* command (of course, assuming
} > that no specific completion is defined)?
}
} compdef -P _use_lo '*'
I've been fooling around with a function to be a front-end to _use_lo
that would try to determine whether the command accepts --help and poke
_use_lo into _comps if it does. Maybe there's some way to combine it
with Adam's completion caching layer so zsh could "learn" which commands
can be completed that way.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Automatic long options completion for --?
@ 2000-08-01 11:02 Sven Wischnowsky
2000-08-01 17:41 ` Bart Schaefer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sven Wischnowsky @ 2000-08-01 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
> Struggling with Cygwin I found myself wishing to get at least trivial
> completion for arbitrary command with long options.
>
> Is it possible to complete after -- for *any* command (of course, assuming
> that no specific completion is defined)?
compdef -P _use_lo '*'
> Of course, if this could extract help text as well ... :-)
We had this before. Sometimes just telling us about great ideas is
enough. Sometimes we need more help and sometimes we don't feel like
implementing this ourselves ;-)
So, if you can come up with something reasonable, that is guaranteed
to never produce a wrong description but at least sometimes gives the
right one...
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-08-01 17:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-08-01 10:00 Automatic long options completion for --? Andrej Borsenkow
2000-08-01 11:02 Sven Wischnowsky
2000-08-01 17:41 ` Bart Schaefer
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).