From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18942 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2000 11:26:40 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Sep 2000 11:26:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 7129 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2000 11:26:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12770 Received: (qmail 7121 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2000 11:26:26 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "ZSH workers mailing list" Subject: Is this statement correct? Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:26:21 +0400 Message-ID: <000501c018be$72f11930$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 This from new section, User contribution/Utilities: ==== Recompiling Functions --------------------- If you frequently edit your zsh functions, or periodically update your zsh installation to track the latest developments, you may find that function digests compiled with the zcompile builtin are frequently out of date with respect to the function source files. This is not usually a problem, because zsh always looks for the newest file when loading a function, but it may cause slower shell startup and function loading. ==== I remember, that Sven explicitly stated that digest files are *not* checked against there source functions to save execution time (individual files are). I do not have articele number handy. -andrej Have a nice DOS! B >>