From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2749 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2001 09:35:11 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Jun 2001 09:35:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 16680 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2001 09:34:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 15157 Received: (qmail 16660 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2001 09:34:18 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: Cc: Subject: RE: Zsh 4.0.2 + 64bit Solaris 8 Forte 6.1 compiler Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:34:59 +0400 Message-ID: <000601c0ffb5$999f20c0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <15162.62750.136548.435614@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006 Importance: Normal > > Andrej Borsenkow writes: > > > > Yes. I do not have either Solaris or Forte compiler so I cannot do it > > myself. As said, either describe how your compiler can be > detected or, if it > > is confirmed that -KPIC is supported by all compilers on > Solaris, we can > > change it. > > > I have made some digging. Oldest compiler I could find is 4.2 which > is quite old (cc: WorkShop Compilers 4.2 30 Oct 1996 C 4.2) and all > series 4 compilers are quite the same. This old compiler knows -KPIC > -option and I also checked xemacs 21.4 configure and they use -KPIC > almost for every system available (irix/sysv4/unixware/solaris). > /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -cflags|grep -i pic > -KPIC Compile position independent code with 32-bit addresses > -Kpic Compile position independent code > So, what others think? Should we change it to -KPIC for Solaris? > > Next thing is how to detect 64-bit. No. Next thing is - why should zsh default to LP64 (that is what you mean. Zsh already supports 64-bit atithmetic and large files)? Does it fix something or adds new features? -andrej