From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12841 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2000 22:46:36 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Jun 2000 22:46:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 26954 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2000 22:46:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12091 Received: (qmail 26946 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2000 22:46:12 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <000627154604.ZM30758@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:46:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200006271502.RAA30019@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "PATCH: Re: (forw) --help able programs and completion]" (Jun 27, 5:02pm) References: <200006271502.RAA30019@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail Lite (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: (forw) --help able programs and completion] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jun 27, 5:02pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > Subject: PATCH: Re: (forw) --help able programs and completion] > > Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > What I was expecting, for some reason, was that menu selection would start > > immediately if there were more than N matches, not wait for the second TAB > > that triggers automenu. > > Ah. No, but that's easy to add. Er, thanks, but you didn't really need to add that; all I wanted was a yes-or-no answer ... > I used the same form as for `select', i.e. one can say `yes=3' to turn > on menu completion when there are at least three matches. Hrm. zstyle ':completion:*' menu 1=3 Does that look a bit strange to anyone else? > Does anybody now want support for `no=3'? Which would mean ...? However, a plain-ol'-menu-completion variant of select=long-list might be interesting.