From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4095 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2000 08:15:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Feb 2000 08:15:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 10167 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2000 08:15:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9923 Received: (qmail 10152 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2000 08:15:36 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Sven Wischnowsky" , Subject: RE: Precompiled wordcode zsh functions Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:15:33 +0300 Message-ID: <000701bf828d$261408b0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200002290745.IAA08900@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 > > Yep. In my implementation digest files are really only one-file- > directories. I.e. they are searched like normal directories by > getfpfunc() (more precisely a utility function used by it). It will > not define all functions in the digest file immediatly. I really > prefer that behaviour because a user has to worry about nothing when, > for example, he wants to override one of the functions with his own > definition in a directory earlier in $fpath. > Yep, after thinking about it a bit more I believe this is the "least confusing" case. Unfortunately, here is where kshautoload cuts in :-) Does your digest handle it currently? What happens with autoload foo contents of foo: some prolog code bar1() { } bar2() { } foo() { } I'd expect, that bar1, bar2 and foo were (re-)defined as just reference to already compiled code (actually, true for every funtction possibly defined in zwc file). /andrej