From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-13379-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 16938 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2001 13:51:35 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (HELO sunsite.auc.dk) (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Jan 2001 13:51:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 25897 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2001 13:51:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 13379
Received: (qmail 25886 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2001 13:51:29 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "Sven Wischnowsky" <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>,
   <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: RE: Completion slowness in current CVS
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:51:25 +0300
Message-ID: <000701c0821e$e9ecbd90$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <200101191341.OAA13647@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

>
> Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
>
> > I have the _feeling_ (no, I cannot prove it with any benchmarks) that
> > completion became slower. Specifically, partial path completion
> now takes more
> > time with the same pathes as before.
>
> As compared to when?
>

Approximately last week. I would suspect signal queueing patch. But may be I
am biased knowing that was supposed to incure some overhead.

-andrej