From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-6495-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 7089 invoked from network); 7 Jun 1999 11:22:49 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Jun 1999 11:22:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 17176 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 1999 11:22:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 6495
Received: (qmail 17169 invoked from network); 7 Jun 1999 11:22:29 -0000
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <borsenkow.msk@sni.de>
To: "ZSH workers mailing list" <zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: More intellegent suffix removing?
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 15:21:46 +0400
Message-ID: <000901beb0d7$edec34d0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal

Consider:

bor@itsrm2:~%> l /S<TAB>
bor@itsrm2:~%> l /SInus/      now I press ``;''
bor@itsrm2:~%> l /SInus/;

note, that ``/'' is not removed, but in this case `;' can not be a part of
current word (but \; or ';' or ";" can). Is it possible (does it make
sense?) do make suffix removing follow Zsh grammar more closely?

/andrej