From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7464 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2000 18:20:50 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Sep 2000 18:20:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 17463 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2000 18:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12809 Received: (qmail 17456 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2000 18:20:16 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <000914112009.ZM15936@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:20:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1000914173545.ZM15847@candle.brasslantern.com> Comments: In reply to "Bart Schaefer" "Re: PATCH: "typeset -m" plays havoc" (Sep 14, 5:35pm) References: <005101c01e6c$8e67ea50$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> <1000914173545.ZM15847@candle.brasslantern.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail Lite (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: "typeset -m" plays havoc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 14, 5:35pm, Bart Schaefer wrote: > Subject: Re: PATCH: "typeset -m" plays havoc > On Sep 14, 8:55pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > } Subject: RE: PATCH: "typeset -m" plays havoc > } > } What happens in case of > } > } splat() { typeset -F -m \* } > > Depending on what stands in for -F, it dumps core. Which has nothing to do with my patch, by the way. Bad Things happen in every version of zsh back to 2.4 if you specify other type-declaration flags with -m. How bad, varies from "mostly harmless" to "complete disaster" depending on which version and which flags, with the more recent versions having the greater potential for flame-out.