From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28642 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 08:16:38 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Jun 2001 08:16:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 13844 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2001 08:15:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 15112 Received: (qmail 13822 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 08:15:48 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "ZSH Workers Mailing List" Subject: RE: sort completion list numerically Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:16:28 +0400 Message-ID: <000a01c0fee1$775379f0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1010627075757.ZM5174@candle.brasslantern.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006 Importance: Normal > On Jun 27, 11:44am, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > } Subject: sort completion list numerically > } > } Is it possible to sort lists numerically, so that foo-2.3.10 comes after > } foo-2.3.9? > > I don't think so, but what happens if you `setopt numeric_glob_sort'? > Actually, it does exactly what I want in this case (incuding proper sorting of 1.2.3 and 1.10.3). Wonder. -andrej