From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17971 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 10:49:40 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 May 2001 10:49:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 24893 invoked by alias); 29 May 2001 10:49:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14528 Received: (qmail 24861 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 10:49:31 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: Subject: RE: PATCH: cygwin stat code (again) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:49:27 +0400 Message-ID: <000c01c0e82d$0870b3b0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 > > "Bart Schaefer" wrote: > > On May 26, 5:37pm, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > } Subject: Re: PATCH: cygwin stat code (again) > > } > > } FWIW, I've been convinced that this change to Cygwin caused many more > > } problems than it solved so it has been reverted in 1.3.2. > > > > Anyone think we should back out the Src/Modules/stat.c changes? > > I'd say we remove this for 4.1, or maybe even some later 4.0, when the > Cygwin changes make this obsolete. It is already changed back in released cygwin-1.3.2. It's not actually breaking anything at > the moment, is it? > No, but the less system-dependent code we have the better (espicially when this code is not needed). Of course, somebody may have 1.3.1 (the only version that has this problem) and try to compile zsh, but the usual policy on cygwin list was "update your cygwin installation" anyway. -andrej